Eugenics and Egalitarianism: Quality Over Quantity

Interchangeable Identity and Quantitative Egalitarianism

 

In past eras your identity wasn’t so separate from your job, but who you were was all encompassing.  A knight had different expectations and limitations compared to a noble woman or a blacksmith.  Modern egalitarianism requires all to be interchangeable by job or role, but that role must remain separate from their personal life (though this is quite impossible to fully achieve).  People also change jobs or roles over their lifetime as much as they change locations – there are no roots, which is very destabilizing for limbic health.  All now have this fragmented identity, compartmentalized in ways that are not grounding or functional.

The modern paradigm doesn’t hone those with the highest potential from a young age into their most suitable roles, which is very unjust to the individual and to society as a whole for losing what they could have contributed.  This increases projection – environment has an exponential mediating function between genetic potential and resulting phenotype yet this is hidden by the normative nature vs nurture false dichotomy – since they will assume that others are held back or helped by environment as much as themselves.  Such loss of potential can also result in a damaged sense of self-worth, regret, and hurt their ego to an extent that further reinforces an emotional attachment to the quantitative egalitarianism itself, because comparing themselves to other’s success would highlight their own shortcomings.  When circumstances in life prevent someone from reaching their full capabilities, they tend to cling to a victim’s identity – justifying or championing their faults instead of striving for strength and overcoming them.  Since society grants all equality, the most dysfunctional are made equal to those held down by creating this false humanist-quantitative equality.  Those held back will lash out at any who seek merit based hierarchy, since they know they won’t meet their squandered potential’s level of achievement.

 

Modern Humanist Egalitarianism Stems From Past Injustice

The current downward spiral originated from the inability to find functional and just hierarchy.  The right balance between preservation of class/station and upward/downward mobility is very hard to find.  Modern increasing loss of identity is rooted in many factors prior to the enlightenment period, which had too rigid of class lines that stagnated over time.  Nobility can have very regressive genetic recombinations, which leads to some dysfunctional aspects in their ability to lead when this is not corrected with some level of downward mobility… yet too much fluidity creates no respect for higher positions as much as resentment is created by dysfunction in those same positions.  Brilliant or even lower level genius (not someone who will go down in history but who has much more use to their society in a higher place) recombinations continually occur to varying degrees in lower classes.  If not realized at a younger age and allowed some level of upward mobility, there is a loss of efficiency, a sense of growing injustice, and an expanding disenfranchised segment of high-functioning people that resent the hierarchy they are under with abilities to rival the nobility.

Uprisings and revolutions aren’t created by the low-functioning; they are reactions by those with the genetic potential to be natural aristocracy that experience some level of actual oppression – this is not the way oppression is now used to describe the dysfunction of regressions or primitives.  Keeping people with higher ranging potentials too rigidly to a low station over generations is actual oppression, as is hierarchy not based on merit as much as right.  This is not to say that there wasn’t some mobility to varying degrees’ pre-enlightenment or to demonize the past, just that there was not a functional system of early mobility.  Looking in hindsight to demonize is easy and not respectable, trying to understand the past is useful when developing a new system to take you out of the compounded, long created mess.  The dysfunction in aristocracy (in-fighting did not necessarily cull out their regressions as well as some type of mobility would, but could create a nobility with decreasing honor and non-merited power) led to more perceived injustice by those with favorable genetic recombinations without noble title or the ability to achieve their potential from a young age.  Hierarchy that is too rigid becomes dysfunctional, leading to a rebellion against hierarchy itself and the loss of identity in current times.

This fragmentation of identity and interchangeability parallels the break between rights and responsibility, which is a hallmark of the current dystopian humanist world.  To make unequal people equal requires the best to give up rights to take responsibility for the weakest, instead of lead them.  The ever-expanding lessors no longer respect their betters but scorn higher capabilities in itself, increasing the downward spiral.  Reality can’t be negated for emotional attachments to quantitative egalitarianism, there is no such thing as quantitative equality in nature because that would require everyone to be interchangeable and the same.  People bond as much from their compatible differences as they do similarities that pull them together – identity (job/role) specialization is a balance between being and becoming.

 

Tying Racially Homogeneous Dysgenics To Hierarchical Injustice

In a Europid society the gap between class disparity would shorten compared to current multiculturalism,  yet the disparity within Europid nations predated and allowed for the immigration invasions.  Racially homogeneous civilizations historically rose and fell on a bell curve – dysgenics of world racial population percentages was predated by dysgenics within Europid societies.  The industrial revolution which prevented the birth and death cycle of Eruopid civilizations, which allowed dysgenics to spread globally.  Going into the rise of a civilization there is a surplus of high-functioning genes with less disparity in ability, culled from times closer to natural selection.  After the onset of civilization, the most reckless are able to piggyback off of the surplus in society, reproducing at a much higher rate with no natural consequences.  The best increasingly decline by population percentages, since the most responsible tend to have less children while focusing on achieving the success that upholds the rest of their society.  Dysgenics was always present in past racially homogeneous societies, it is simply the dropping of quality in the population by percentages.  The industrial revolution stopped this rise and fall, allowing more surplus than ever before in an overly complex system, creating rapid global dysgenics.

 

Pre-industrial civilizations started off with less disparity in abilities and everyone had a use – closer to true qualitative egalitarianism, which is valuing people for how best they fit their nature.  Civilization dysgenics promotes a high volume of reckless reproduction while straining the most responsible to do so, the disparity between countrymen grows.  The civilization becomes harder to uphold while the quality by percentages starts to become bottom heavy.  This downward spiral doesn’t allow for self correction, because as percentages are regressing and polarizing (the polarizing does not necessarily reflect class lines at all) it creates chaos that compounds hierarchical injustice.  With stricter class divides in the past, this results in the previously discussed rebellion.  The lower classes are more likely to turn against their nobility in proportion to how chaotic the civilization becomes from dysgenic decline, in tandem with injustice enraging the high functioning recombinations stuck in lower stations to rally them.

Reversing Incentives from Natural Dysgenics into Eugenics

 

Preventing dysgenics is the key in preventing the fall of a civilization and injustice in its hierarchy.  Upward mobility would be efficient if society is geared towards improving its population’s average quality of genes.  This prevents the natural Europid egalitarian tendency from warping into quantitative egalitarianism, which is completely destructive since the quality of people will polarize.  There always needs to be a balance between being and becoming, a balance between egalitarian impulses and respect for natural merit-based hierarchy, a balance between what you feel and your ability to reason.  Making unequal things equal is a rejection of reality, skipping steps results in more inequality and injustice.  You can’t help your own people or others if you can’t logically see reality and reason yourself to the best possible options for end results – the means and ends cannot become separated.  Dysgenics makes a people vulnerable to external threats, reversing and preventing this is the only way to preserve Eruopid greatness and identity.

 

Egalitarian reproductive liberties given to all yet the best made responsible for incentivized dysgenics, the incentives have to be recognized and reversed. The comfort of society will allow the most dysfunctional to reproduce more rapidly than is natural, and society will take up the burden for the dysfunction of low functioning offspring which continues this cycle. Societies burden is carried by the middle to higher functioning, and this needs to be prevented to not decrease their replacement rate from the strain.  Recognizing the need to limit the rapid expansion of regressions is not cruel, but crucial.  Limiting dysfunctional reproduction will create less of a burden on the middle class and highest functioning of the society, allowing those capable of contributing to afford a large family.  Incentivizing high functioning couples to have more children will only maximize the circulation of the best genes, over time raising the mean – eugenics simply is encouraging higher quality replacement by percentages.  Incentive based eugenics for the upper crust is far more effective than hard eugenics, since Europid greatness has a tendency to rebel against force; the more dysfunctional outliers are well suited for hard eugenics, and in this case some force or changing welfare incentives is needed.  Incentivizing eugenic couples’ replacement will also put them in a slight standing of prestige, which culturally glamorizes eugenic traits.  This cultural shift is in itself eugenic and creates healthy competition for the best mates without micromanagement.

 

A Propertarian Model Outlining A Reverse Incentive Eugenic System:

 

Civilizations in a globalized world need to combat dysgenics.

 

If a couple has favorable traits, they should be incentivized on a sliding scale to have more children based on their combined abilities (IQ, genetics, extreme athleticism, rare skills, and other outstanding success can have an affect on the scaling method).

 

If a couple is within a normal scaled range, they should be allowed greater rights (like local voting) when they invest in their society by having two or more children to replace themselves.

 

If low functioning people are incapable of caring for themselves or their offspring (in a eugenic society the cost of living would be much lower since the unnatural strain of billions of hominids in dead weight would be lifted off of Europids) , after one year on aid they can choose to continue aid in exchange for having their tubes tied or a vasectomy (both are reversible if they change their outputs to earn that).  If they choose to not get the  procedure then they also choose to forfeit their aid and make responsible contributions to their society again.

 

Severely dysfunctional people (major degenerative diseases, retardation, extreme forms of mental illness, dangerous and untreatable types of criminality) should all be required to have their reproductive abilities terminated.

 

This is all possible with voluntary genetic testing, IQ testing, gathering information on performance in real world situations, athletic competitions, birth records, requirements for the continuation of aid after one year of not working/studying/contributing, set standard procedure for long term mental ward patients, those diagnosed with mental retardation, and specific criminal convictions.

 

Balancing Natural Hierarchy and Qualitative Egalitarianism

 

Job specialization from quantitative differences is enriching when there isn’t a huge disparity between the quality of people.  Even with varying abilities all can be appreciated for their contributions.  The conundrum of a desire for both individualism and egalitarianism in Europids is harmonious if you realize that creative individuality allows for job specialization, while qualitative egalitarianism appreciates all for fulfilling the best of their nature.  The true essence of egalitarianism is qualitative, which preserves individual and group identity while protecting against injustices for not being the same.  Even the best political or economic system alone could not create a healthy Europid society, but by preventing dysgenics the quality of a people by percentages of replacement will make or break their future generations.  The best balance between natural hierarchy and egalitarianism in a Europid society is only possible through combating dysgenics.

 

In a eugenic system, a gifted artist wouldn’t have the same quantifiable skills as a mechanical engineer or a general contractor, but they all would contribute to the world by living up to their own qualitative nature, including inspiration.  All three would be appreciated equally under the law based on their qualitative value, not just their quantifiable utility.  Art, infrastructure, other’s unique vantages, and nurturing the creative spirit are crucial to the Europid vital force.  The ugliness of modern art, the jarring infrastructure, and the tyranny of popular opinion parallels the hollowness of these times.  Not having merit based hierarchy destroys your true ability to connect because appreciating differences and varying abilities is how you truly can appreciate others.  Modern times has increased comfort with technology, but makes everyone into interchangeable cogs in a machine – far less fulfilled without true connection or a cohesive identity.  It is in quantitative inequalities and qualitative equality that you are able to truly bond with others.  Eugenics is needed to keep the vital force of Europids alive, and pass the torch of a better future to your progeny.

 

“The only true voyage, the only bath in the Fountain of Youth, would be not to visit strange lands but to possess other eyes, to see the universe through the eyes of another, of a hundred others, to see the hundred universes that each of them sees, that each of them is; and this we do; with artists like these we do really fly from star to star.” -Marcel Proust

 

Outline for Interview with some UN Details and Other Information

In a recent interview, I completely didn’t follow the outline I had for it because I found out that, like speeches, I get nervous and unfocused in interviews.   I think it is important to link my outline here so that all the background information is present to give what I am talking about context.  I will soon be writing an article (or maybe series) on the UN and World Bank, along with much more of the material.

Here is the outline:  https://quip.com/oP0uA4kJMxqc