Category Archives: Feminism

Femininity Interrupted

There is a dual nature to femininity that is vastly ignored and/or distorted in its modern understanding – maternal instinct is the driving force of both.  A giver of life will be the most protective of that life.  The ability to bear children is a gift and a curse; the greatest strength and the most powerful weakness.  

Healthy blood lust of women is very deeply intertwined with the love of their children and family unit.

Maternal instinct applies to one’s children as much as it does to one’s people and future generations.  If there is nothing a woman would kill and die for then there is nothing she truly loves; the reverse, however, is not true.  When a woman becomes consumed by blood lust unchecked by the protective aspect of maternal instinct, then it is self destructive – not only to her but to all humanity. 

Feminism creates an abomination of maternal instinct.  Civilization now rejects the second half of woman’s nature, only allowing for the first to be acknowledged so that the blood thirst attached is ignored and held unaccountable.  Women are placed on a pedestal in-that they can do no wrong and their nature is distorted.

Rights and Responsibility should never be separated.

The push to hold off on marriage, love, and bearing of children in a proper household only compounds the drive of blame with no accountability.  This blame is at the center of feminism; hatred is its fuel.  Women are taught that they are to be competitive with men – that patriarchy is oppressing them.  Instead of healthy home’s bringing women completeness and purpose, they are pitted against what would fill that void.  Feminism blames the emptiness on what would heal them; what they’re supposed to bring nurture to they bring destruction.  Without this drive to protect, the love is lost.  The suppression of understanding the destructive half of the feminine doesn’t prevent it, but amplifies it, and in turn the loving half of maternal instinct is lost.

“She is wedded to convictions – in default of grosser ties;

Her contentions are her children, heaven help him who denies!-

He will meet no suave discussion, but the instant, white-hot, wild,

Wakened female of the species warring as for spouse and child.”

-Rudyard Kipling from Female of the Species

Women can’t intellectualize this loss because the design is to lead towards it.  Leftist logic is not sound, it is all based on emotive persuasion and ideals that seem good but when applied in reality are destructive – as most unnatural things are.  Feminism is a cancer; modern globalist mentality doesn’t allow for the cancer to be caught until it has metastasized.  Feminism is embedded in the globalist mindset to blame patriarchy as if males have always held females down from glory. Women aren’t taught to accept their own nature; they can’t accept what they are never made aware of.  Females are pushed to be like men, unable to see the harmony in complimenting them.  Instead of protecting their offspring and home against any who threaten their pack, the blood thirst has taken over. Women war against all mankind for the losses of what feminism has robbed them of, continuing the cycle by going from victims of feminism to perpetrators of it. Regardless of not understanding the void inside of them, they still feel its loss, but out of ignorance chose to target their salvation in revenge. “Hell hath no furry like a woman scorned.”

The pro-life movement wants to stop the effects of rebellion against natural order without correcting the causes of this evil phenomenon. What does it say about a civilization when the givers of life would chose to tare that life out of their wombs? There are many obvious evils promoted by abortion – an instant gratification mentality having a quick fix, recklessness with life, irresponsibility, the loss of traditional values, immorality, promiscuity, etc. These are all things that lead to this evil and compound it as discussed above, yet there’s a plot within pro-choice propaganda that is vastly ignored.  The deeper reasoning behind the feminist abortion agenda is to create the mentality that children are a trap set by men to oppress women.  This rejection of the masculine’s leading role for the family unit puts the future generations as the burden of her suffering in a woman’s mind, distorting the nature of the female and male joining to make a whole. The protector is then taken away allowing for women to go through eternal pain only to blame what they never knew was their shield; the nurture that sustains the male’s leadership is cut off in the same blow, turning the masculine cold.

Healthy femininity is only possible when understood for its dual nature, but also must be the reciprocal of masculinity.

Women and men should never be compared in quantitative measures for equality as the goal.  To create a reciprocal unity to one in mathematics, the product of 2 and ½ is perfect. There is no judging of the ½ to the 2 in math, yet this example will never be without animosity when applied to human nature.  The ideal that men and women must have their merit based on the same standards of comparison will only bring chaos in reality, because what fulfills women is not the same as what fulfills men.  The male and female should be judged to each other in qualitative respects – the closer they are to fitting their true nature then the higher their quality.  This wisdom is rejected by modern intellectualism and scientism.  Natural order between the sexes is too deep for quantitative analysis and will drive the female ego to repress knowledge of the id.

Humanity has lost touch with it’s innate constitution.

There is another phenomenon in addition to the aggressive blood thirst of mainstream feminism.  Instead of vengeance, there are those that can’t let go of the longing for love.  These women try to find solutions fruitlessly, since they are unable to reject the basis of modern mentality.  Patriarchy is still seen as the evil oppressors, yet these women rebel against nature in the opposite fashion by pushing passivity as an absolute for the entirety of mankind.  This is terribly unnatural – the solution is still based on the delusion of ignoring the essence of maternal instinct and rejecting the masculine all together.

If a woman’s only drive is to be compassionate, gentle, empathetic, nurturing and passive then that creates a moral paradox. When there is no discernment between how and who this applies to, these traits are applied to all which is no longer a virtue but a vice, in that it allows for passivity to overrule maternal instinct.  There is a balance between the passive-nurturer/lover and the protector/warrior of a woman.  The feminine is meant to be the passive compliment to her masculine patriarch, creating a whole – to continue the chain of life and death.  Unity of a female to her male is what creates an eternal cycle of rebirth.  The new age, hippie, and feminine/nature worship ends that cycle and leads to death without renewal by shifting the delicate balance.  Applying the passive half of maternal instinct to all is evil. Standing for everything yet nothing at all is the reason behind the saying: “the road to hell is paved with good intentions”.  

The inability to discern between what is precious and in need of protection and what isn’t turns into solipsistic inaction in the face of destruction.  Passivity, complacency, and appeasement disguised as tolerance will bring the self-righteous suicide of the world.  

The hippie style/new age mentality also ends in hatred: passive-aggressive blood thirst.  Ignoring the dualistic nature of femininity will leave the blood thirst as the only remaining aspect; whether it is aggressively hostile as the former or passively suicidal like the latter.  Without complimenting the masculine, the feminine will doom the world.

Some stories tell of how Kali fought and killed two demons. It was then, celebrating Her victory, that She drained the blood from their bodies and, drunk from the slaughter, She began to dance. Kali became overjoyed with the feel of their dead flesh under Her feet, and She continued to keep dancing, more and more wildly, until She finally realized that Her husband, Shiva, was underneath Her, and that She was dancing him to death.  Realizing this, Kali’s wildness did slow down, but only for a short while; it is believed that She will eventually continue Her dance and that when she does, it will bring an end to the world.”


The globalist mentality is egocentric, ignoring the id/nature of the sexes.  Kali fought and killed two demons – these demons represented the dual nature of the feminine.  She was so caught up in the power of blood thirst that she didn’t even realize it was her own husband (mankind) whose dead flesh she was dancing over.

Monotheism is automatically negated by focusing on its oppression in the literal sense, instead of trying to learn it’s hidden wisdom of the absolute truth.  Maybe Genesis of the Bible isn’t about oppressing women, but saving humanity from the fate of Kali – preventative not reactive.  The teachings are not to blame women but to understand that they must never dominate the male, or the world is doomed.  Traditional gender roles are to protect all from their own natures; they are not perfect (as people are not perfect) but they are the best for what can realistically be achieved. Feminism harms women the most, leaving them empty and scorned by the loss of fulfillment – the ruined possibilities of their nature’s true purpose.

I will make your pains in childbearing very severe;

with painful labor you will give birth to children.

Your desire will be for your husband,

and he will rule over you.”

The punishment for eating of the forbidden fruit was death.  The above passage is interpreted as an alternative punishment, yet it is still a death sentence.  Genesis 2 is an outline of natural order versus temptations – to not live by its teachings is to reject wisdom and eat the forbidden fruit of knowledge.  The punishment has always been death.  

Genesis tells of two trees in the garden of Eden: The Tree of Knowledge and the The Tree of Life; yet, only the Tree of Knowledge was forbidden by death.  The reason the Tree of Life wasn’t forbidden was because no temptation for it existed – they were given harmony and life everlasting.  Genesis’ blueprint for the interaction of the genders is essential for continuing the everlasting life/death cycle.  Once this wisdom is rejected, the sentence is death.  The more solipsistic and knowledgeable people become, it creates the desire of the Tree of Life – self preservation of the individual – while the rejection of wisdom brings destruction for all.

Accept maternal instinct in its entirety, allowing the blood lust to be driven by protection of what one loves – the family, the tribe, the nation, mankind – in that order.  This is only possible when accepting the submissive role to the masculine, creating the harmony of a family unit that builds up to the world as a whole.

Feminists and modern mentality of the masses equates natural order to female weakness.  It is easy to be selfish, to give into temptation, to settle for instant gratification, and to emasculate men with the laws of modern societies backing women at every step.  The truth is that the most strength is shown in standing with tradition while the whole world is spiraling out of control in suicidal rebellion.  

Accept the duality of the feminine in its best possible form; accept its role in complementing the masculine’s lead – or accept doom.

Feminist Apeasment of islam and Conversion: A Method to the Madness

What draws Westerners and Europeans to convert to Islam?

The surface level response: that women who convert to islam are desperate and/or naïve; that men who convert to islam just want to commit heinous acts and feel righteous about it.

To an extent these basic explanations apply, yet there is a deeper underlying sickness- conversion to islam is a reflection of the regression of Western and European civilization. After deeply contemplating this question, one can go a bit deeper into what the subconscious motives of converts might be and how they mirror the subversion of European traditional cultures.

Another related question that will be addressed is: Why does the feminist platform side with the left that appeases islam?

The lack of traditional values and natural order in Western and European societies creates a type of void, especially for women, and deeply frustrates men. Emotive reasoning is used to justify why feminism is needed and programs people to jump into trigger responses when this antagonistic dynamic between the sexes creates a chaotic environment. Post-modern society has targeted healthy forms of patriarchal influence to break up the family unit at the base, which compounds into the loss of communities and up into the loss of healthy societies. The two genders were meant to be complementary as opposed to competitive, and though many will not admit it (even to themselves for not losing face is valued higher than admitting and fixing fault, another ominous example of a crumbling society with no honor) people are hardwired to seek the harmony of natural order. In the West and Europe, males are constantly emasculated while women are pushed to lose touch with femininity as if it equates to weakness, this dynamic is solidified into being a norm by the media, public schools, politicians/legislation and social settings. The only form of patriarchy not attacked is rap/pop culture and that of perpetual victim groups like muslims, so the only forms of patriarchy left are the unhealthy versions, creating a cyclical cycle of apportioning blame in ways to compound the spiraling downward dynamic. A clear example of this is Sweden’s blaming its muslim rape epidemic on ‘patriarchy’ while censoring out the fact that the rapists are muslim, as to not be ‘racist’.

The fact that traditional cultures have been disintegrated now leaves the West and Europe with a shame based void filled by materialism and distorted multiculturalism instead of natural order. There are no healthy examples to follow, and most can not admit that this is the root of their frustration, if they are even able to see it. Those that are too brainwashed into saving face or too simple minded to understand the above concepts still attempt to find a way to quell this frustration, so they go from one end of the extreme to the other. Leftism is the flip side of the same regressed coin to those in the West and Europe that convert to islam, the destructive version of traditionalism.

It is a set up where the left is playing both sides.

The destruction of traditionalism and natural order pushes the youth into social settings that promote materialism, superficial interaction, and push meaningless promiscuity under the guise of brainwashing slutiness to mean freedom, while treating healthy traditional values and natural order as oppressive- promoting what is emotionally and spiritually destructive while blaming the void it creates on what is constructive. The single mothers and emotionally destroyed women created from this can feed into feminism, further blaming healthy patriarchy on the causes of its own push for “sexual freedom”. Those leftists who begin to resent the post-modern options or other shamed and disenfranchised youth with no healthy options will then look for the only traditional outlet they can find: islam.

There will be a direct correlation between areas deeply immersed in leftism and conversion to islam- European Union countries are starting to see this rise already, but this is just the beginning.

Many wonder why the feminist platform does not stand against islam. It is because their true intentions are to maintain an air of having the moral high ground, they are no different than any other perpetual victim group of the left. They are all about continually shifting blame instead of taking responsibility to create a better future- victimizing under the guise of moral superiority. It is no accident that leftists push emotive based humanistic reasoning to trigger the masses to only care about intentions, when they are clearly conflicting with bad outcomes- loss of societies healthy support structures leading to a least common denominator is the end game.

Leftists feel that as long as they are part of a perpetual victim labeled group then it somehow does not include them with the groups of their peers that they shame. It follows suit that leftists would see converting to islam as a good means to circumvent their frustrations of not having natural order, while constantly redirecting the moral obligations to face the problems created by the muslims they let into their countries, still redirecting blame. The further into islamic immigration invasion a country falls, the more leftists might convert out of fear of taking responsibility for what they caused and to continue blaming others by being part of the perpetual victim group, if they are not already part of another perpetual victim group or needing to fill a void of it. Leftists have no honor or ability to admit and fix faults, they lead European and Western civilization into a downward spiral.

The sole purpose of each perpetual victimization group is to grab power for the sake of domination alone, the left just ties them together for its own globalist end game of chaos in need of world authoritarianism. Feminism falls in perfectly with islam, it’s not senseless or contradictory like it seems. The fact that the left champions feminism and muslim “advocacy” at the same time proves that there is no logical method to the madness of their supporting masses other than the desire to blame. However, there is a clear agenda by those leading the masses since they mirror their masses by allowing intentions only to matter with no accountability. Places further regressed into leftism, that push feminism on the masses, sink deeper into the stages of the islamic immigration invasion and will have increasingly higher rates of conversion to islam: It is the design; a way for the masses to never face problems that they created with an inevitable end game of desired chaos in need of authoritarianism. The globalist trap is set up to be a cowards way out for their idealistic, spineless masses.