“Do not judge” is a common trope now used both by the socially conservative and liberal. Even if they have different intentions, the result is the same. Universal acceptance is the hallmark of our era, and its calling card is shame cast upon those who judge.
The irony of this is that people tend to conflate shaming with judging. Although they are similar in some ways their differences are important. Public shaming is designed to mold others to fit societal norms while judgment is a part of distinguishing yourself from others. When many speak on the utility of judgment, they are actually thinking of public shaming as a tool to shape society. In this format it is a “civilizing” tool of that carves out universalism itself. This molding of the masses has the opposite effect of judgment.
Judgment is a tool of separation that gives identity to those who use it to distinguish themselves from others. When judgment is externalized its utility is maintaining the borders between one’s in-group and a given out-group. There is no self without judgement and those who shame you for judging are trying to strip you of your boundaries, even if they don’t realize it. Physical and legal lines do not define a people, and without the social boundaries created through exclusivity there can be no “people.” You cannot champion some indefinite amalgamation of White identity without having standards that keep behaviors, and genes, from infecting the in-group.
(Common Filth did nothing wrong… lol this is a good example and I do not fully agree with the man, but I respect him).
The parallels between current forms of White nationalism attacking any constructive criticism of Whites is very similar to mainstream liberals and conservative Christians who attack anyone who judges; neither has an identity they are upholding, just a list of universal “no-no’s.” This is the core of why a nation is only a simulacrum of the tribe and is cursed to forever grasp superficial representations of what it has already lost to its intrinsic expansionist nature. True identity always starts locally and can only be built organically from the ground up; it is only civilization which imposes top down measures of assimilation through the implementation of shame to perpetuate a veneer of behavior that is meant to be mimicked in public. If you take a tribal people and tried to copy their behaviors in order to fit in, you would only further alienate yourself from them. There is no way that any outsider could authentically replicate even the most common of their practices because their conception of “self” has been built from birth.
From the outside it is impossible to see what they see in their identity and they will easily spot and judge those who are different no matter how hard they try. For example, the Sami people of northern Europe can’t be copied by donning similar dress or trying to learn their dialect – their identify is infinitely more complex than that of any nation’s. Since the Sami identity is so organic instead of top down they would immediately distinguish between other similar tribes of Sami and themselves – whereas you might see them as all Sami.
The revolution of civilization is one that’s against human identity and its corresponding nature, but the comforts of it draw you in and keep you dependent. It is your own temptations and need for security en masse which damns you. Most cannot even be bothered to judge their own family for self-correction but shrug that responsibility outward onto their society without regard for their inability to separate rights and responsibility. If you cannot sacrifice or stand for anything then you can’t complain when nothing changes. By placing the responsibility outward you expect others to fix your responsibilities and consequently give your rights away to an ever-growing civilization that has a life of its own and is destructive to those who uphold it.
The logical end of public shaming is universal acceptance. Because of its role in conformity, it invariably parallels civilization’s continuous evolution towards globalism. Globalism is inherently flawed because there is no one way that works for everyone, and even if there were it won’t be forever. Every species is in constant social and biological evolution, with sub-species at various levels of parallel and non-parallel development, so the idea of a single lifestyle being ideal for any long amount of time is to attempt to unnaturally freeze humans in time.
Civilization though isn’t natural nor stagnant. Civilization has taken on an evolutionary course of its own through its continuous cycles of destruction and forced rebirth over the last few millennia and has not been beneficial for those who uphold it when examined in aggregate. Instead of benefitting the species within it, civilization, through the hammer of shaming, serves to shape the people in a way which that works for the system itself. This stands in marked contrast to the 2 million years of local tribalism that humans perpetuated before the mistake of the agricultural revolution. The benefit it had was allowing trial and error to function towards logical ends. Either the local experiment works for the people attempting it (for a certain amount of time at least), it fails because of internal or external pressures and they organically modify it, or the people simply cease to exist.
Without real bonds on a local level, each successive generation has less of a foundation to stand on. In its place is the never ending societal call to proselytize to the masses and absorb new members, create new members, or both. Consequently every generation will continue to rebel from the last –left right left right– until it finally meets a nihilistic universal loss of identity where everything is acceptable that allows for expansion…and judging would only limit growth. The crater left from Universalist shaming dogma is the destruction of boundaries on an ideological level, before it undeviatingly demands the tearing down of physical ones. It starts with the lapsing of personal standards, and ends with your people being out-competed.
A tribe is made of the people within it and while they may feel “tied” to the land, the tribe knows it can migrate just as many species do. Territories shift between animals competing within a species and humans are no different in a natural state. At some point in civilization though, land itself became used to define the people instead of the people defining the land – just as nationalism is a simulacrum of tribalism, so becomes soil a simulacrum of blood. This continuous process we have seen through the centuries parallels the evolution of civilization itself. The larger it gets the more its boundaries change to encompass more, growing like cancer. Public shame within such a society kills local identity because such loyalties would work against the ever-growing civilization; whereas tribal alliance allows for the varying natures of varying peoples.
The only time that one should externalize judgment –differentiated from shaming– is to show your own how they are different from others. Through this the individuals within your group can define the boundaries of the self, determine the identity of the group itself, and (most importantly) define those which will always fall outside of the group in whatever varying degrees necessary; like a bullseye surrounded by rings. It is not top down, as it radiates from each individual “within,” and when expressed outwards it is not used to adapt the “other” but instead to keep them at a distance which does not interfere with the identity of your own. Organic identity allows members to show judgment in forms that the members will recognize and outsiders don’t, functioning as a distinguishing factor from the act of shaming.
Shaping the masses isn’t going to maintain organic identity because the effects maintain civilization. Personal judgment perpetuates an identity through the imposition of standards and limits on the self, extending to the in-group through both perceptible and imperceptible methods. It makes perfect sense that as civilization evolves into its final universalist form only those who judge are shamed… Shaming has always been a tool of conformity and expansion while judgment serves to define and separate – they are mutually exclusive.
Europids are the only group in known history on a course of out-moralizing each other to self-destruction, yet you all wear it like a badge of honor. The world’s hominid population was around 1.6 billion at the turn of the 20th century. Today the world has around 7.3 billion, with that number projected to rise to 7.8 billion in the next decade. Europids made up at least ⅓ of the World’s population, around 530 million, in the year 1900 (see reasoning at end of article), which is a low estimate – some estimate as high as 50%. Today that number isn’t much higher, roughly around 800 million, making Europids only 11% of this rapidly expanding world, at most.
There are around five and a half billion new hominids, and the most rapidly expanding have been the most primitive and reckless. You should let that sink in – almost 3.5 times the natural world population’s numbers in additional unnatural expansion alone. 5.4 billion in freshly made dead weight, and counting. You should be scared.
How did this happen?
You need look no further than how Europids colonize to see how uniquely responsible they are for other races. Where other groups, like muhamadens, kill most of the men or enslave them to work to death while bringing the women in to procreate at the bottom of a caste system, as happened in North Africa. Whites, on the other hand, build infrastructure and are fair to the native populations; they increased the survival rates of those they colonized. This was the first indicator of what was to come, by bringing civilization to the un-civilizable it took primitive races slightly out of a state of natural selection. Before colonialism, primitive numbers were very small and not growing. They were reckless in procreation but they were not able to sustain the lives they created. With medicine and adequate food, this reckless breeding did not stop. The way that Europids colonized shows just how altruistic they are, yet few could then see where this would lead… very few can even see it in hindsight now and less have the mental dexterity to face the full implications.
Industrialization allowed Europids to see and stop the natural selection of other races, while simultaneously having a dysgenic effect on their own. As colonialism fell away, food aid replaced it and medical advancements were given to primitives by bleeding hearts. Lothrop Stoddard (in The Revolt Against Civilization) states that, even in the 1920s, the brightest of Americans didn’t have close to a stable replacement rate. The most responsible have upheld this increasingly strained Europid worldwide economic backbone and the most reckless expanded to be “oppressed” by it. The best Europids had to increasingly work harder to be responsible for the growing burdens of a global civilization, in turn having to choose between achieving much harder earned success in life or having a larger family requiring all their effort in high investment parenting. Primitives and mixed breed regressions could now fill the Earth to maximum capacity with no natural checks to safeguard such recklessness. In short, the brightest of Whites have had to work ever more, foregoing breeding themselves, to maintain order.
Grant predicted the decline of the quality of Europids (in The Passing of the Great Race) but what he didn’t account for was that as the best Europids did not replace themselves the primitives would keep expanding and be increasingly imported. If there is one trait the plebeian classes of Europids shared with their nobility, it is a tendency towards altruism and empathy. True nobility would be able to see bigger pictures and have the strength to lead their people the right way, sheltering them from falling to their innate guilt – that guilt being both a blessing and a curse. It allowed for high trust societies, while also being a grave weakness if the flocks ever grew too large compared to their shepherds. As civilization became more complex, the best of Europid stock did not replace themselves and could no longer lead their masses away from inevitable self destruction of altruism. As this shift took place the last century or two, it compounded the expansion of primitives with ever-growing emotional mob morality. Idealism has long run rampant with no care for end results.
Luxuries also increased from industrialization, enabling the degenerate escapism (toys, boats, pornography, video games, etc) needed to ignore reality for those capable of seeing it. If the masses are at too high a ratio to their leaders, the masses end up leading their betters – requiring either extraordinary courage to face or something to drown out or distract from such a backwards world. The aristocracy retreats and disconnects; disallowing their informational flow-back and external replacement for out-breeding recombination and better genetic innovations.
White genocide is intrinsically tied to altruism and an ever-dwindling restrained natural aristocracy. No one is genociding primitives. The only genocide is happening against Europids. Keeping primitives afloat and importing them is creating the genocide of Europids.
As Europids went through these dysgenic shifts, the ethics and virtues of their nobility fell to emotional instant gratification of the mob. The result of guilt-based morality is one of victimhood being equated to morality; the most dysfunctional and reckless are the oppressed, the victim. By championing the “oppressed,” the problems created by Europids are compounded with more “help” and “fairness,” which is deeply rooted in the projection of the “Nature versus Nurture” false dichotomy. The Humanist egalitarian fantasy is revealed; if every “oppressor” is taken out and all the “oppressed” championed it yields a super peaceful and loving world filled with no pain. This delusion is the only way that most Eurpoids can ignore the ominous rapid primitive expansion, as if it will never catch up to them in the near future.
The First World is Drowning in Idealism and Emotional Morality
The root of this Humanist dystopia is another fundamental quagmire in the modern mindset since industrialization. Pain, struggle, and hardship are seen as things to be avoided at all costs instead of a normal part of life. Pain, struggle, and hardship builds strength and virtue by facing and overcoming obstacles if it is ever present and not piled on at a certain age. A love for easy luxury, especially in the young we coddle, helps to distort Europid world views. Our children are easily turned into bleeding hearts when faced with reality and a shockingly different adulthood. Show a scenario of the pain or suffering of an “oppressed” group, attach any narrative to it (because photos/videos do not have context), and those with a guilt based morality project away. When comfort is the focus of life and reality hits, many feel a need to find an oppressor to blame – shifting away blame is a type of shield from the emotional pain of facing racial ramifications, which is why being a (race realist) nationalist and humanist is quite a conundrum. The saddest part is, this circular downward cycle could be avoided if the natural aristocracy stood up to lead their sheep instead of trying to let them lead – there is nothing less respectable than a humanist nationalist leader.
Some races are more volatile than others, among many other distinctions in characteristics. Humanism is based in egalitarianism instead of recognizing the volatility of a group, the focus is shifted away to create a victim. The only way for unequal people to become equal is by weakening the strong and blaming them for the suffering of the dysfunctional. This is why the only scenarios you see in propaganda are of the “oppressors” victimizing the “oppressed”. The million more examples of the “oppressed” harming their own, other “oppressed” groups and the “oppressors” are nowhere to be found, or at least not as well funded and promoted. You tend to pay attention to what is most readily available – for the purpose of promoting the egalitarianism of Humanism, what is most available online and in the media perpetuates emotionally-driven victim morality.
Where did this victim morality come from? Gandhi was a false prophet, increasingly forced into the moral fabric of Western Civilization as some great role model. What did Gandhi do? He guilted his own people into destroying themselves and hating natural hierarchy – the perfect false prophet of Humanism. He was anti-colonial – biting the hand that fed him and promoting hatred of Europids who actually helped India – and promoted the acceptance of enemies to India: muslims. All the bloodshed and pain brought to his fellow Indians by the muslims he guilted them into accepting is on his hands. India has the worst affirmative action to promote egalitarianism and shame the past, which is exactly why he has been promoted so much in the West. Any time you see a SJW signaling their idealistic morality, thank Gandhi.
Now all violence is demonized, unless perpetrated by an “oppressed” group that just needs more unnatural equality. Primitive violence is completely ignored or blamed on environmental factors (created by the people making up that environment) when it is really a regular part of primitive interaction, any violence to keep them inline when clashing with higher trust societies is then focused on as a means to demonize Europids even further. Preventative or reactive violence is no longer distinguishable from pointless or impulsive violence, leaving no means of maintaining any semblance of civilization or protecting the high functioning from those they uphold. There is one undeniable trend, the “oppressed” deadweight is growing exponentially off of the guilt of their “oppressors” who aren’t replacing themselves. Primitives cannot help it since reckless procreation is instinctual to them and they have long since been provided with the means. There is no amount of help or environmental changes that can make primitive races fit for civilization, and in trying to do so they are unnaturally expanded in ways that continually feed off the host civilizations and compounding the tidal waves of Europid guilt projection.
The increase of inhumane, chaotic, and horrible conditions worldwide directly parallels dropping Europid world population percentages (a decrease of natural aristocracy by ratio contained within). This only creates a rise in guilt (all they see around the world are suffering primitives) that reinforces those dropping percentages, feeding off of the Humanist worldview that primitives are oppressed. Separating rights from responsibility is unnatural, if Europids are responsible for all other races then they need to have rights over those they uphold in a natural hierarchy. Not to be swarmed by those they are trying to help but freed to give the structure needed. Humanism is something that is not ever going to favor Europids since they are the only group interested in helping others. But, in doing so from an egalitarian standpoint, they will destroy themselves and the post-White primitives? The world. Appealing to other primitives through nationalism will only go as far as it helps to destroy “oppressors” and will turn on Europids the moment that it no longer gives instant gratification to primitives.
This notion that an unnaturally expanded world, that is sustained by Europids, could just return to some type of nationalism with complete separation is also an egalitarian delusion. Who will enforce this equal separate nationalist utopia? Enforcement will need a heavy hand, the same heavy hand of any hierarchy, yet the notion we can all break off and support each others nationalism is very foolish. It is madness to think that it wont need Force and Hierarchy.
Nationalists are able to see that mainstream conservatives are playing a rigged game, by accepting the premise of the left. MWhat many of them are unable to see is that they too are playing a rigged game by accepting victim morality and any aspect of humanism. They will never win this game because, by design, it is against them; Whites are too high functioning to ever be a victim group. No one cares to be Captain Planet except for those same Whites. Even if Europids could become dysfunctional enough to be considered an oppressed victim group, no other group would champion them because no other races have a guilt-based morality. Nationalists, like David Duke, advocate for a turn to “true Humanism,” when that would require Europids to be slaves to those they are responsible for. These are not the type of leaders that Europids need to get them out of this mess. He advocates for victim-morality and, in gaining a following, he is literally blind and leading the blind. Admittedly, he has the best of intentions, as any blind man out for a stroll by a cliff has no bad intentions. True leaders need to attack the premise of White genocide: Europids upholding the unnatural expansion of primitives. Thinking such unnatural expansions will ever be stable and that, if the “oppressor” group is taken out, all races will depart on their way to being self-sustaining nationalists is a fool’s notion.
Emotional morality sounds good and feeds the ego, but it is a very slippery slope. Right now is too crucial a stage in history for emotional morality. It is do or die.
David Duke is the Anglo Bernie Sanders
This might come as a shock to many nationalists, but the Jews did not create this expansion, they are having to deal with it just as Americans and Europeans. It is ironic that David Duke screams “Palestinian Lives Matter,” leading his flock to emotional signaling. He encourages nationalists to shift blame and sympathize with the victims, aligning them with those who would destroy Whites, to support their own nationalism. Sanders does the same thing with Black Lives matter and helping those who would destroy his own. Playing by the same game just increases the destruction of the other and out moralizing each other as the primitive hordes keep growing. Both Duke and Sanders project their own qualities and compounded struggles onto primitives and champion those primitives that don’t help their own in any way yet from a vantage of in-group orientation wanting to help their own. They attempt to appeal to the guilt of primitives and get them on board with humanism, but they will only go so far until it stops benefiting themselves. Neither Duke nor Sanders are fit for leadership in these crucial times, they’re both true believers lead by their altruism.
Appealing to primitive and volatile races to support Europid nationalism is the most naive form of altruism ever. Being pro-primitive is anti-white – the pally victim narrative is anti-colonial and anti-racist in nature, just like every other idealistic anti-“oppressor” narrative. Mohammedans will turn on you the second it no longer suits their agenda, just like any other primitive group. Some don’t even realize that they shouldn’t yet bite the hand while it is still feeding them. Even in a humanitarian dystopia, people still follow winners, not victims, so if others fight your battles for you or fix your problems, they take the power and become your new master. When you support humanism for primitives and demonize apartheid, you reinforce the narratives leading to White genocide. Instead of having the nerve to face humanism head on, you skulk around the periphery and swallow yourself. There is nothing different about Israel “apartheid” from South African apartheid (that Israel ironically was the last Europid country to support), and having consistency is important because it empowers your followers with demonstrable logic when they go out to change minds.
Admitting supremacy would take away from the delusion that if the “oppressors” were gone, all Europids and mohammedans nationalists would somehow live in peace. No nationalist can support primitive nationalism because they will never take care of themselves. There is no genocide of arabs, their numbers have climbed greatly in the last century off of food aid and medical advancements provided them by “oppressors.” They will never be stable without massive intervention. To think we can all live apart is a fool’s notion long gone, the world depends on Europids. Are you going to build up an audience of Whites that wants to save primitives but then expect them to not keep expanding or being sustained by Whites which is too heavy a burden to bear?
South Africans built prosperity that drew in and expanded subsaharans, who then felt entitled to that land. White genocide correlates perfectly with the expansion of primitives because, as they grow, the weight and burden of that guilt reinforces policies that will lead to Europid extinction. Championing primitives as victims, denounce the apartheid of the “oppressors” in Israel, and furthering the modern and wrong-headed victim morality is a losing strategy. No primitive will care to help Europids, as if they ever could, when they can’t even care for themselves when given the means. The moment Europids stop floating their numbers, the Europids will become the “oppressors” again for mohammedans. Whites are far too functional for victim morality to ever benefit them, it seals their fate of self-genocide. It is a losing battle.
Does anyone expect primitives to stop reckless reproduction, stop being a burden, be productive, and champion an increase in White replacement rates while wearing “Save Whitey” ribbons? MEven if Europids ever became dysfunctional enough to be considered a victim group, there would be no one to save them since only Europids are pulling “Captain Planet.”
The same guilt that allowed for expansion is this projection you see let out in the form of humanism – you don’t win by repeating the same mistakes. It does nothing at all for Europids to equate the fall of their greatness to the plights of primitives, when the burden of those primitives IS the fall of Europids. In fact, it only confuses an already complex matter. By shifting away into focusing on how Whites are oppressed like primitives, it doesn’t allow for now deeper examination of extremely complex factors playing into this fall nor does it allow for self correction or fixing old animosities between high functioning groups.
The only way to fix world stability is to reverse the unnatural expansion and return to more functional population ratios, both internally and externally. That will not happen because none are willing to stand against their own masses to accept their supremacy, stop compounding things, and take realistic measures to stop the ever growing dead weight killing Europids slowly, both emotionally and economically. Right now is an extremely crucial time period, all that matters is Europid replacement rates, not championing primitives. In a few decades the aging populations of Europids will cause a further decline in their numbers. You are not creating your future generations – those generations are simply not being born while primitive races are still expanding unnaturally. Every primitive is a direct threat to future generations, this is a lesson you will learn whether you like it or not.
Countering the downward spiral by reinforcing its narrative and accepting victim’s morality is suicide. Those primitives will turn on you the moment you can no longer do something for them. Humanism is WHITE SLAVERY to uphold those they “oppress.” Europids kept stable numbers for awhile. As the primitive populations grew, and yoke of responsibility did too, and Europids have stopped replacing. The next generations will be so outnumbered and so strained by that weight, they will be eaten alive by the primitives your hearts bleed for. When you see a piece of propaganda meant to guilt trip you, think that this is one more primitive that should never have been born, swamping and suffocating the life out of your future generations – you cant choose to reason with your altruism instead of letting it consume you, wearing a sign of suicide like a badge of honor.
The only way that Europids are going to survive the next century is by recognizing their own supremacy and how this projection has led to such unnatural expansion. Out-group morality is not a survival trait, it is suicide. No one has been genociding any primitives, but that narrative is what promotes upholding such unnatural expansion – the genocide of Europids is the result. To shake free of this, people need to admit their altruism, admit primitives do not have it, and see the negative effects it has imposed on themselves and their progeny. Nationalist leaders need to reject the whole premise of humanism and see that, right now, it is do or die: all that matters is Europid replacement rates and rejecting victim guilt morality, the whole paradigm. In all its forms, victim morality MUST be completely rejected. What unnaturally goes up must come down, you cannot stop this, you can only be selective with whom you choose to save. Prepare your mind, the best case scenario is that billions will die when they’re cut off the “Great White Guilt Tit.” Nature reclaims, it cares not for whether the bounty is of high or low moral caliber and, not matter what is done, many Whites will die in the process.
Estimates in Part One:
It is hard to tell the exact number of Europids in the year 1900, however looking at the breakdown of countries’ populations (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_population_in_1900) a rough estimate can be made. It is safe to guess that Canada, the US, Australia, and Europe’s populations were all Europid then, along with at least half of their respective colonies. This roughly places Europid numbers at 530 million in the year 1900, which is a very low estimate considering that no Latin American Countries were counted. At this very low estimate, Europids made up ⅓ of the world’s population.
It is extremely hard to find an accurate reading of the current population of Europids worldwide. Taking 80% of Europe’s population (after deducting Turkey) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Europe), 70% of the US population, and adding that to the entirety of Canada’s and Australia’s populations (not deducting for foreigners there to account for diasporic Europids), the current estimate is around 800 million. Of the 5.7 billion new hominid growth in a little over a century, only 270 million (5% of the new growth), dropping Europids from ⅓ of the world population to just under 11%. Since Europids have such an aging population with unsustainable replacement rates while the world is rapidly expanding, in a decade or less that should fall below 10% and even in America White Children will be a minority (http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2015/03/05/Census-White-children-to-become-minority-by-2020/9751425612082/).
The Israel-palestine conflict is seen from such a simplistic vantage point that it leads to a false dichotomy – One must understand the entirety of Middle-Eastern dynamics, not one localized aspect of them that has been divorced from all context.
Palestinians are simply arabs with a jihadist political agenda that draws them to the need for an ethnicity . They have no specific ethnic allegiance alone; the importance of their fight is to expand the islamic lands (“waqf) and implement sharia law. Before the decline of the Ottoman Empire, there was no distinction between arab ethnicities. Palestinians, like all muslim arabs, give their first allegiance to muslim ummah. They will never compromise, because a compromise requires both sides to make concessions; when dealt with as equals, muslims can only accept gains while giving nothing in return. This is also why Coptic Christians in the Middle-East are constantly persecuted by muslim arabs no matter if they share the same arbitrary ethnic identity – at best they live as de jure second-class citizens under the protection (or rather, at the mercy of) islamic law, where a blind eye is turned to their random – and not so random – victimization.
The argument against Israeli occupation ignores the fact that muhammaden arabs are occupying all land outside of the Arabian Peninsula. The importance of this is that there will never be a compromise in which some people are not displaced. Middle-Eastern Jews have been displaced and re-accepted by their own in Israel. Muslims choose not to accept their fellow muslim arabs because creating the “palestinian” as a political tool is far more important than the lives of their ‘brothers’. Others should not bear the burden of the consequences that stem from of the selfish priorities of the wider arab and muslim world.
There is no possible compromise with mohammaden arabs. Their political identities are shallow adoptions that are easily cast off when it becomes politically expedient to do so. Asking Israel to accept one-sided peace would just allow arab muslims to keep playing a false victim role. According to the doctrines of shariah law, all ceasefires and truces with an enemy like Israel are only for the purposes of refreshing and rearming, and never are permitted with the intent of sincere settlement or peace. Muslims will only have peace according to their own unconditional terms – that the world submit to islam, and convert, pay the jizyah, or die.
Who are the faultless victims in the Middle-East?
The false dichotomy of “Jew and arab” ignores the plight of the nationless. Zoroastrians have almost been completely eradicated by muslims. Coptic Christians have no refuge from their torment and no homeland to defend them. Time and again they are butchered in Egypt, where they have no support or security. Apostates of islam are also left helpless and homeless in the Middle-East.
The real victims of Gaza are Copts, suffering in silence at the hands of their islamic, “palestinian,” “victimized” counterparts. This is paralleled across all islamic lands in which Christians reside as dhimmis under shariah law – they endure constant, unending persecution.
Looking at ethno-nationalism alone is the flaw of bleeding hearts on the right, who swallow palestinian propaganda, as the hypocritical anti-colonial claims of occupation seen with biased tunnel-vision works for the left. The Middle-East must be viewed in terms of theocratic tribal nationalism.
The real two-state solution will require both halves of the current paradigm to make concessions – a real compromise. The palestinian territories would be Israel’s contribution. Since arab muslims have not ever been willing to give anything up they must take a loss too. Jordan should be required to give up equal land as the west bank territory to be added to it in an actual compromise, likewise Egypt equal land for the Gaza strip. This two-state solution will give a homeland to Middle Eastern Christians as a safe refuge where they no longer have to live under another theocracy’s rule. Perhaps a Coptic government can choose to provide a safe refuge for other oppressed non-muslim populations, and islamic apostates as well.
The requirements of this compromise are quite reasonable when looking at the entirety of Middle-Eastern dynamics. It puts Israel’s objections over a two-state solution to rest because they won’t fear those lands will be used as a means of political jihad and continual attack. Under current circumstances this is a valid safety concern as arab muslims under the palestinian pseudonym have made their intentions – unceasing violence and escalation until Israel is destroyed – quite clear. The current wrong-headed debate will be shut down, as the security risk to Israel posed by jihad will be properly recognized when theocratic distinctions are added in to the discussion. Israel can give up responsibility for those territories – with equally added land from Egypt and Jordan to match them in compromise – because a Coptic christian country would pose no threat to them. If anything, this gives Israel an ally in the region and more importantly gives Middle-Eastern Christians a level of protection that they have not had, massacre after massacre.
This two-state solution is just, fair, and good; allowing arab islamists to play the victims for the aims of political jihad, while they slaughter the real silent victims, is a dishonorable travesty.
“Society can and does execute its own mandates; and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it practices a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself.” -John Stewart Mill, On Liberty
Sweden is committing multicultural suicide. In the late 1970’s the Social Democratic Party started to flood the small nation with immigrants from third world countries, especially islamic ones. Hundreds of exclusion areas, which are no-go zones ruled under shariah law, stain Sweden’s land. This is the epitome of why Democracy is a failure; bringing in low information leeches for votes in a numbers game.
One strong supporter of this multicultural flood drowning the Swedes is Barbara Lerner Spectre. She is an American born Jew who made Aliyah (birthright immigration to Israel by Jews of the diaspora) before immigrating to Sweden and starting up a non-denominational institute for Jewish learning called “Paideia”. Her desired role for Jews in this is outlined in the following excerpt from an interview:
“I think there’s a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural, and I think we are going to be part of the throws of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode. Jews will be resented because of our leading role.”
The premise of Spectre’s statement is false when she insinuates that multiculturalism is needed to keep Jews safe in Europe. Is Europe now safer for Jews than it was in the 1980’s? The country most regressed into multiculturalism happens to be the country she made her home. Sweden is a prime example of what the European Union is heading towards. If Jews support Israel or refuse to join the Swedish multicultural-suicide mission, they become the target of propaganda. Even worse, a blind eye is turned when pro-Israel Jews are assaulted by muslims in Sweden, now one of the most hostile places in Western Civilization towards Jews. This can be seen when Ilmar Reepalu, the left wing Mayor of Malmo, blamed attacks on the Jews for the fact that they were not condemning Israel’s “genocide” in Gaza.
It is of no help to Jews to indiscriminately shame all whites, creating resentment. If anyone wants to combat unjust hatred of Jews in Europe then do so when it arises instead of oppressing Europeans and creating justified resentment. Attempting to destroy European culture, identity and sovereignty is a bitter revenge that will continue a cycle of death and destruction.
The real reason that this wench makes Jews her excuse for multiculturalism is to bully them into leftist stances so that any European opposition can be silenced by equating them to Nazi’s. Make no mistake, Spectre is not trying to help the Jews, she is utilizing them as a tool while apportioning them the blame. If she truly wanted to protect Jews in Sweden she would be opposing multiculturalism and standing against the appeasement of muslims that target pro-Israel Jews. This traitor has sold her own out to the Globalist Agenda, as many prominent leftist Jews have. They are setting the stage for the average Jew’s coerced cooperation to be the means of Europe’s downfall and the scape goats for the destructive effects of bringing in muslims. Spectre is creating the “resurgence of antisemitism” on two fronts – both the left full of muslims, and the right European Nationalists who now see Jews as the cause for multiculturalism. She is knowingly putting Jews on a political suicide mission.
How can Spectre get away with making Aliyah and then aiding those in Sweden who target Jews for their support of Israel? Why are other Jews around the world silent on her betrayal? Why is she allowed to use her Jewishness to move herself beyond criticism in her abuse of Europeans? Will the self-destructive unity of the Jewish people remain their absolute goal till the bitter end?
The reason that Spectre opened up a school is to influence the minds of not only young Europeans, but also Jewish youth. As the Globalists know, the best means of covert control of a people is indoctrination of their youth because upcoming generations are the future. The leftist logic pushed all over the West creates a rewarding-the-victim mentality. Everyone wants to be part of a perpetual victim group – it’s easier to blame others instead of being shame mongered themselves. This in combination with being spread out across the diaspora is a recipe for conformity to leftist indoctrination. A very high percent of Jews attend university putting them at an even higher risk, creating a perpetual-victim group type of united front and shaming of the feared out-group. The fact that most of these university ‘educated’ Jews are from a statistically higher IQ bracket makes them a greater threat because they earn much more to influence the world with.
Once this fear based unity is in place it becomes self sustaining – pushed by the Jewish communities and religious institutions. It’s illogical for Jews of the diaspora to seek dependance on government protection or want to oppose self-empowering gun rights, yet that is exactly what has been happening. Rabbi Eric Yoffie, former head of the Reform movement, listed in a recent Haaretz article several reasons for Jews siding with supporters of gun control:
“…the community’s affiliation with the Democratic Party; the fact that Jews are urban people and detached from the culture of hunting or gun ownership, and suspicion toward the NRA, which is ‘associated in the minds of many Jews with extremist positions that frighten Jews and from which they instinctively recoil’.”
Instead of being proactive and embracing their freedom to defend themselves, the fear and dependence on the left is further embedded into the Jewish community.
Is this fear based in reality or is it strategically misleading?
Support rates of Israel are the highest amongst Conservatives/Republicans, while Democrats and Progressives have the highest support rates of outright hostility towards Israel. It is the leftist fools who make libelous claims of Israel being an apartheid. The masses of ordinary American Jews give their allegiance to the Democratic Party which allows the Palestinians to play the victims to justify their terror and entitlements. According to the March 2013 survey by the Pew Research Center, only 2% of Conservatives favored the Palestinians over the Israelis.
In the Haaretz article excerpt above, it states that “Jews are urban people detached from the culture of hunting or gun ownership” – this gives no reason to limit the rights of those belonging to the culture of hunting and gun ownership, nor does it even address the true purpose of the Right to Bear Arms. Self protection – is essential to freedom, especially in urban areas, where criminals are likely to have and use guns but law abiding citizens are disarmed. The most disturbing part of the statement was that the NRA and patriotic citizens are “associated in the minds of many Jews with extremist positions that frighten Jews and from which they instinctively recoil”. This basically is a fluffy, indirect way of equating all whites to Nazis and punishing them for it. All A’s (Nazi’s) are B’s (White), if all A’s (Nazi’s) are considered dangerous then all B’s(whites) are too? All dogs are animals, if all dogs have paws then all animals do as well? This is a logical fallacy and a sloppy excuse to throw Jews into a fear frenzy against gentile whites. Conservatives/gun-rights supporters are not only more in favor of Israel, many are proud to have WW2 vets in their family line. This adds insult to injury of comparing them to Nazi’s while trying to unjustly oppose the precious freedoms of their country. The same dynamic can be seen in Europe with groups like antifa in their shaming of the English.
In the years leading up to WW2, there was a distrust of Jews claiming that they were loyal to each other before Germany, and that in-group Jewish unity morphed into sabotaging the German people. This parallels to present dynamic’s where the majority of Jews are opposing American patriots which makes them seem disloyal to the USA and subversive. This is beyond self destructive – instead of protecting Jews it turns allies into enemies by this unprovoked resentment of whites. Many conservatives stick to their values and do not give in to anti-semetism, leaving them wondering why Jews are so hostile towards them. Jewish shame mongers of whites, like ‘Dear Abby’ at the White Privilege Conference, are disgracefully oppressive to those who have done no wrong.
Jews of the diaspora, especially leftists, are creating a victim complex that is out of control. Mob mentality has taken over the entirety, directing its revenge at an entire race. Until there can be understanding of the past in more than an all-black-and-white vantage point, then it sets up a continual repeat. A healthy future is only possible when the past is learned from, instead of a never ending destructive cycle played on back and forth. An entire race cannot bear the blame for what that they did not do; to shame them for actions not their own is in itself shameful and dishonorable. No one deserves punishment for conflicts before their time – the people of now only owe the future.
Dramatic changes in Jewish voting patterns can be seen in more recent elections, showing that many are starting to realize this destructive dynamic against all odds. The most profound shift has been in France. According to a report by polling organization IFOP, almost all French Jews voted strictly left in the 1980’s. By 2007, 45.7% of Jews in France voted for the right wing candidate, Nicolas Sarkozy, in the first round of the presidential elections. That is 14.6% higher than the general population in which only 31.1% of gentile French voted against their left. Jews in America consistently voted around 80% Democratic Party, until the 2012 Presidential Election dropped down to 69%. An 11% shift to the right in one election’s time is huge. Jews are starting to reject their religious and community leadership’s insistence on the support of the Democratic Party despite all the obstacles in place. The fear based unity is what is silencing Jews from openly attacking their left thus far, yet that needs to happen.
Leading up to WW2, Jews were blamed for the morale-destroying attitude of the press, propaganda in Germany during WW1 and accused of being culturally destructive through use of the media. Ironically, the Western World is in a suspiciously similar state now with the media oligopoly and Hollywood being disproportionately dominated by elitist Jews. This unjust hatred of constitutional rights and conservative American’s is once again seen by Jewish traitors in Hollywood who poison the minds of the youth, bringing resentment to all Jews for their cultural destruction, and further influence the Jewish community into fear based unity. Harvey Weinstein, a big-time Hollywood producer, recently stated that he is making an anti-gun movie that will make the National Rifle Association “wish they weren’t alive”. The new full feature drama will take the NRA “head on”he boasted in an interview on Howard Stern’s radio. “I don’t think we need guns in this country. And I hate it. I think the NRA is a disaster area,” Weinstein said.
Where does this hatred of the NRA and the American Constitution come from?
The Hollywood elitist stated that he never owned a gun and never will, as if that has anything to do with the natural rights of others. He does not have to live in poor areas where crime rates are very high, how many times has he had to defend himself or worry that the police would take too long? Is this Hollywood producer aware of the massive amounts of criminal gun violence in his gang infested state of California? Or is he too politically correct to address the real problems surrounding the rich oasis that he and his colleges are sheltered in? Does this putz think that disarming law abiding citizens does anything to stop gun violence? Or is he so far removed from reality by his wealth that he pushes on others what he himself would never have to live with? Who made Weinstien an expert on gun rights or gave him permission to push his lunacy on others? Does this schmuck realize that the 2nd Amendment is an integral part of the Bill of Rights and he is attempting to supersede the Supreme Law of the Land? That is called Treason.
Hollywood elitists are not only guilty of thinking their asinine opinions negate the US Constitution, but play a major part in dismantling American values/culture, pushing average Jews into political suicide from baseless fear unity, turning allies of Jews/Israel into enemies, using their Jewishness to be above criticism and shame monger those that have done no wrong. Hollywood elitist Jews, similar leftist Jewish activists of the diaspora like Barbara Spectre, are traitors to the USA, Western civilization, and to all Jewish Peoples across the world. The First Amendment was never designed to allow for cultural tyranny or to attack the Second Amendment – the Bill of Rights was designed to be integrative with each amendment protecting the others. Hollywood and the Media Oligopoly is the antithesis of “Freedom of the Press”.
In early 2013, Biden said:
“I believe what affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else,” he explained, “…Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media, are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry.”
This is no mere slip of tongue, similar to his unprofessional ‘praise’ of seal team 6 for taking down Bin Laden. He knows better, as do those writing his speeches. This is a tactic of the leftists/globalists, very much related to Barbara Spectre’s above speech, in that it apportions blame to all Jews. Jews blindly give their allegiance to deceiving traitors – elitists, cultural Marxist professors, leftist politicians – who are playing ordinary Jews as their puppets from all ends under the guise of unity from fear that is falsified by the very same traitors.
In Biden’s recent trip to Israel regarding “peace” talks he said:
“The only place where there is a possibility for an island of stability is quite frankly between the Palestinian people and the Israeli people, in two secure states respecting one another’s sovereignty and security.
“The President believes, and I believe, this is one of those opportunities- one of those moments in history that have to be seized. There are difficult decisions, very difficult decisions and I, like you, believe the prime minister is up to it.”
This is clear coercion. Biden has no difficult decision nor will he bear any of the consequences for continually making peace pacts with those who will not honor it. Note how the two fronts of resentment created by leftist Jews of the diaspora puts Israel’s at the mercy of the globalists.
That is strategic.
Many think that it is Israel pulling the strings calling it a “Zionist” conspiracy, but it is far more complex than that. The flow of power is not from Israel outward, it is the opposite way. The left has used Jews to shame monger Western/European Nationalism and create the hatred of Israel from the double standard. The globalists will demonize all nationalism to get their desired mass chaos in need of world authoritarianism; Israel is not the puppeteer, and will no longer be a needed puppet once its use is up in the near future. Now that the blame is in place, creating many enemies for Israel and cutting off all real allies, Israel is at the mercy of the Jewish elite of the diaspora. The globalists have begun turning on them, this can be seen by the media’s biased portrayal of Israel in middle eastern conflicts while never holding muslims to any acceptable standards. Things will escalate in the years to come, most Jewish nationalists do not know that their left never plans to keep Israel in the end game. The enemy striking from above at Israel/Jewish Nationalists is the same enemy of Western Civilization, yet they will be played against each other because of the blind unity of Jews to their elitist left and the resentment of Jews from the double standards created by it.
The far right and left both believe that there is the same ‘Zionist’ conspiracy, yet that is a decoy. The Jews interpret the term ‘Zionist conspiracy’ as an attack on their self preservation and any Jews that support Israel. This is equated in the minds of Jews to the inequality of standards that the muslims are held to in conflicts where ‘Zionists’ are blamed for self preservation – against islamic aggression. European/Western Nationalists and Jewish Nationalists also have the same enemy striking from below: muslims. The double standard only makes the European/Western nationalists more likely to side with their muslim enemies out of resentment of Israel’s healthy nationalism, yet this is the Globalists’ desired effect to compound the Jewish victim complex.
The Globalist design is to kill two birds with one stone.
‘Zionist’ has become a trigger word meant to confuse and be misinterpreted by all sides. This is done so that the effects of problems will escalate while preventing the causes from being understood. The far left-wing blames ‘Zionists’ and Israel, but will never boycott the real enemies of freedom – Hollywood/media oligopoly or globalist/leftist academic institutions – because they are a product of them. The right-wing blames the Hollywood/media oligopoly and globalist indoctrinating leftist institutions but calls them ‘Zionists’. This is confusing to all Jewish peoples across the right-to-left spectrum, strengthening the fear based unity.
Elitist, fake-Zionists do not actually support Israel other than as a tool to work towards their ends. The Jewish people are blind to the internal war between the Globalist Jews and Nationalist Jews – the cowardly traitors cling to Jewish unity as a means of covert sabotage.
History is repeating itself. The design is more complex, but this is a manufactured repeat with terribly higher risks at stake. Jews; do not ignore these warning signs! So many are speaking up in ways that only compound the effects but never reach the causes because the confusion and fear-based unity. Once these delusions are dropped, bravery is needed to break the silence and surpass fears of social restrictions. It is easy to live in denial until it is too late; it is hard to take a stance against one’s own even if it is needed to save all the ordinary Jew’s from their traitors.
The sad reality is that the Jews are marching to the beat of their own demise, creating enemies on all fronts while playing into the hands of their real enemies. The globalists are winning by pitting Jews and gentile Europeans/Westerners against one another.
Instead of forgive but never forget, Jews have forgotten but never forgiven.
People say that if they fight fire with fire then they’re no better than their muslim enemies; the logical flaws in that comparison is completely self destructive. If group A keeps putting out fires set to their homes by group B, then group A will continually be subjected to random victimization. If group A burns down the houses of group B with them inside of it, then group A will be safe. Does that make group A the same as group B? No. The reasoning is all the difference in the world. Group A is not trying to burn down the houses of group B at random. Group A is trying to prevent loss and death of their innocents, it is defensive, but there comes a time when the best defense is a good offense. Reactive measures can only be continued so many times until proactive measures are needed.
Infidels would be fine to live and let live, but living in constant fear of muslim aggressions and being called racist for any type of preventative measures is not acceptable or sustainable. No one can force muslims to coexist. To try to place the burden of their destructive ideology and culture on the host nations which they immigrate to is unjust.
The leftists keep trying to take the moral high-ground by twisting tolerance into appeasement so they can feel good about themselves while their own people are continually victimized. Allowing atrocities to continue because it isn’t ALL muslims committing them, is to say that infidels must sacrifice a percent of their people who are attacked continually in order to maintain a one sided peace.
The feelings of muslims are not worth infidel’s lives.
Muslims are part of a destructive ideology, and it is no one else’s responsibility to discern between moderates and radicals- certainly not at the cost of their innocent’s lives. This is not an ideal world, everyone must deal with harsh reality.
The Burmese are continuously trapped in conflicts with Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar, and since the Buddhists understand the above concept the world media oligopoly demonizes them for it. Buddhists would be fine to coexist, but they will not continually sacrifice their people to a delusional one sided peace. They care more for their culture’s continued existence and their own people regardless of the asinine, self destructive world opinion. The globalists point out how Muslims are the minority, as if that automatically makes them the victims or oppressed, which the muslims use to further push their propaganda.
Muslims use immigration as a covert invasion and they are not interested in coexisting with the Burmese. The Burmese will not sit by idly and let their culture be attacked or sacrifice even a small number of their people to the islamic invaders, but instead take a reactive stance to the overt islamic attacks on their monks, women and people in general. This is respectable; the Buddhists stances are not hateful by refusing to let their society become self destructive- they are loving for protecting their own people!
Self preservation of one’s culture, identity and future generations is what nationalism is all about, including the Burmese Buddhists and their 969 movement. Not only does the world demonize the Burmese for their fight back, it shames their healthy nationalistic movement of 969, the movement to keep the Burmese financially supporting their own people instead of their enemies. Muslims use financial means to make political campaign contributions in the new nation of Myanmar and also use wealth as a tool for love jihad in addition to other means of destroying the Burmese, so the Buddhists way of trying to prevent situations of violence is by economically pushing the muslims away from their communities.
Yet leftists still target 969 as something that is hateful; what they are saying is that self preservation of any kind is hateful.
Globalism calls loving one’s own enough to protect them a type of hate, when that is best for humanity as a whole! Look at the bigger picture, not individual disputes, and see that it is muslims who can’t coexist with others; they are a tool for the globalist agenda. The humanist mindset of some idealistic, yet impossible, world peace is also part of the political agenda of globalists. The leftists use of political correctness to place feelings of muslims above lives is strategic; multiculturalism is a tool for destroying host cultures. It is all feeding into the same end result of a chaotic world with no sense of identity, unity, community or bonds- a world that is in need of authoritarianism.
Islam is not a threat in and of itself but the globalist tools must be dropped, including the above mindsets, to prevent the immigration invasions of host countries. Preventative measures have not been allowed compounding over time in places like Sweden, which is in its last hour, reactive measures are inevitable. This situation must be looked at as a whole in that different groups can not all be in varying levels of reaction, singled out over details, but stand together to be proactive against islam. The details of each individual conflict can be bickered away at a million times over, but wherever muslims go, chaos and destruction follow.
All the individual conflicts with islam- from Greece to Israel to India to to Australia to the Burmese to Sweden to Russia to the United States to Nigeria to the Philippines to France- they are all the same conflict, a conflict which has been going on for over 1,400 years.
Israel is the birthright of the Jewish people. It is a vital component to continuing the cultural, ethnic and religious ties of Jews in their own ancestral land, maintaining them as one people. To assume that sustaining Jewish identity is synonymous with hatred of others is asinine. The state of Israel is first and foremost for the Jews, incorporating many aspects of Jewish culture and law into the everyday life of its people and legislation. This by no means is done in a way to infringe on the rights of Israeli’s with other faiths, however it is not taken away for the sake of non-Jewish Israelis because to do so would circumvent Israel’s primary focus, which is the preservation of the Jewish people.
Self preservation is about love of self and to demonize this as a hatred of others is an attempt to push covert genocide. The Right of Return is essential to maintaining this preservation since Israel is a democracy; an immigration invasion can covertly be an attack on a nationalistic democracy by turning it into a numbers game ruining homogeneity. Implementing strict standards to maintain national identity in regards to the population acquisition through immigration is very important. Israel’s own people should come first in their land and their needs considered above all else in regards to any immigration criteria. There is nothing immoral about denying entry to those who would destroy Israel or its purpose for existence, and there is no moral high ground in pushing a destructive multiculturalism. Idealistically, the leftist/globalist propaganda to shame Israel for their Right of Return laws seems so morally superior; in reality doing so is just a cowards form of covert genocide by proxy of immigration legislation. The Right of Return laws protect Israel’s Jewish identity, it does not harm any others identity to deny them the right to destroy Israel’s identity.
The leftists and globalists push a warped and over-simplified version of humanism that cuts out identity, community, culture and in the end skipping the build up from the family unit to community to nationalistic society to humanity as a whole ruins all the support structure of healthy civilization. This cutting corners creates a very hostile world and will never produce any type of freedom, but will lead to chaos and create the need for a totalitarian world government, which is the desired end result. Israel is targeted so much in the media and by leftists/globalists because they are a healthy version of nationalism and in the end that is the biggest threat to world government take over. Therefore, Nationalism as a whole must be demonized since the utopia trap of globalists is built by destroying the bonds that hold families, communities and people together to create a chaotic and cold environment in need of global authoritarianism. Israel is a main target because it kills two birds with one stone by pushing the propaganda it continues the demonization of nationalism. Then the pressure and strife created by the inequity of the UN and related smear campaigns actually takes away from Israel’s potential and makes life harder on Israeli’s, eating away at their cohesion.
There is nothing wrong with Nationalism in and of itself, there is a good and healthy spectrum of it needed for self preservation of any people. The leftists/globalist weapon of political correctness will only allow for the worst form of nationalism to be pushed as the only form of it to make this healthy self preservation impossible. Now nationalism will be redefined in a positive context which is a healthy goal for any people to strive towards. In some ways Israel is a good example of something more on the healthy end of the nationalist spectrum.
Nationalism is the spirit of a people’s identity. Nationalism is loyalty to ones own people and nation.
Nationalism is striving for the prosperity of ones people through unity and community.
Nationalism is the desire for political independence from globalist interference.
Nationalism is common aspirations, values, ancestry and cultural characteristics that binds kinsmen together.
Of all the leftists and globalists that oppose Israel, there is none more vile or reproachable than Israel’s far left. They champion those that would destroy their own people to selfishly gain acceptance of world opinion because they are not strong enough to oppose this covert attack; they join in with it. Many patriotic Israeli’s are able to see this for what it is: treason. The same leftist/globalist propaganda has infected many Jews throughout the diaspora worse than any and they take the easiest route possible to stand against a healthy form of strong Jewish nationalistic preservation in Israel. These same leftist Jews then use their Jewish identity as a means to jump on the perpetual victim group bandwagon by feeding into the shame mongering of nationalism in general, especially European and Western nationalism. Leftist Jews of the diaspora create a double fold of selfishness that takes away from the continuing prosperity of Jews and nationalism everywhere.
The Jewish left of the diaspora is an integral part of helping push destructive multiculturalism on Europe and the west, which is also a form of covert genocide. There is a spectrum of leftist/globalist Jews, from those that actually oppose Israel to those who hypocritically support Israel in words yet help the attack on European and Western civilization, identity and culture. The ones that are leftist and support Israel yet do not allow for a possibility of a healthy nationalism and preservation of European and Western civilization create even more hatred of Jews and Israel because of the double standards. In actuality pro-Isreali leftist Jews of the diaspora are a great threat to Israel, by taking political stances that help the destruction of all nationalism including Israel’s, while hypocritically creating so much resentment of Israel, a healthy example of nationalism. Leftist Jews of the diaspora have no right to use their Jewishness to silence criticism of their political stances that are harming European healthy nationalism.
Jewish unity is something that is pushed above all else, it makes Jews strong, but since it is done as an absolute instead of an objective ideal it has become self destructive. The Jewish left, especially of the diaspora, has run amok by promoting propaganda against Israel and/or moral relativist ideals to help the agendas of Israel’s enemies. Furthermore, they hurt Israel and Jews everywhere by clinging to Jewish unity only in a self serving way to be above criticism for their reproachable stances that is destructive of many natural allies and burns bridges for Israel and Jews everywhere. The leftist Jews that want to push for Islamic immigration invasion of Israel are seen as self hating and yet the double standards of leftist Jews of the diaspora who do the same to European and Western civilization are not opposed because of this self destructive absolute unity ideal. Before 1948 Jews were considered to be a problem to others nationalism, but after the state of Israel was created they had their own country to build around and for their own people. The unquestionable unity of Jews to their left will only render the purpose of Israel pointless, and turn self-preservation into self destruction.
The leftist Jews falsely accuse the opposition to their political insanity as unprovoked anti-semitism; any healthy form of nationalism they unjustly equate to Nazism. This inequity and injustice creates resentment towards Jews, as is natural when people are silenced and demonized for striving to maintain self preservation; this dynamic is something that Israelis and Jewish nationalists should be able to relate to and understand. Shame on leftist Jews for using their identity as a means to oppress others or be beyond criticism, bringing resentment to all Jews for their leftist/globalist political stances that are not tied to their being Jewish. Shame on all Jews for allowing Jewish unity to be more important than speaking up against the leftist Jews perpetual victim role power grab and abuse of the Jewish identity, leading to double standards.
Over time this has compounded and brought about a reaction of antisemitism because of this unfair and hypocritical double standard. Shame on every leftist Jew who uses their identity as a reason to push their agendas against European and Western nationalism, regardless of what part of the leftist spectrum they fall on it either makes them a traitor or if they support Israel then a hypocrite. Jewish unity to their left of the diaspora leads to other nationalists becoming enemies and morphing into unhealthy versions of nationalism because of the oppression of any healthy forms of nationalism. The leftist/globalists are always going to be enemies to Israel, knowingly or not, because leftism/globalism is the antithesis of healthy nationalism. Yet the unity of all Jews to the Jewish left (especially of the diaspora) then burns bridges and makes possible allies into vehement enemies. Jewish unity for the sake of unity alone is like unity of the body with a gangrene limb, the sickness will infect the whole and kill the body along with it. The biggest threat to Israel and Jews everywhere is this absolute unity. Non-leftist Jews, Israelis and Jewish nationalists are destroying natural allies by not stepping in and opposing shame mongering of Europeans by groups like antifa or leftist politicians and professors.
Europe is under an immigration invasion, by the same enemies as Israel, and no longer allows their own people sovereignty in their ancestral lands. European cultures are being destroyed, their democracies drowned out in numbers games, their rights devoured and Jewish shame mongering and the inability to speak out against leftist Jews is aiding this. Effects of this dynamic are being mistaken as the cause, further compounding it and creating even more of an unhealthy Jewish unity to oppose a justified resentment as anti-semitism. This unity of all Jews to not oppose their left but instead oppose those who are victims of the Jewish left appeases this double standard, making all Jews an accessory to these crimes.
Europe is the ancestral land of Europeans and their natural right to implement immigration restrictions or reversals as is best fit to their own people’s cohesion, similar to Israel’s Right of Return. It is the right of European and Western counties to implement their own versions of nationalism without external forces dictating how they are run, as Israel has implemented their own version of nationalism. In the end people take the best care of their own and can support each other to make a better world by supporting each other’s healthy nationalism. It is time to stop letting unity for its own sake prevent justice or else all Jews are part of appeasing and sustaining this compounding inequity. Silence is beyond dishonorable, it is reproachable; Jews as a whole have a duty to stand up to the leftist/globalists diaspora’s abuse of their Jewish identity for political gain. As Israel is the birthright of Jews, Europe is the Birthright of Europeans.